Forensic Computer/Digital Examiner Case Study Project Assignment

Forensic Computer/Digital Examiner Case Study Project Assignment

Instructions:

Forensic Computer/Digital Examiner Case Study Project Assignment

This paper must be researched and written using the Forensic Discipline you choose in the Forensic Discipline Topics Discussion during Week 1. You will be expected to carry out research, using outside resources. In addition to the discussion of your topic, you will be expected to find a real-life case with enough detailed information to discuss it in relation to the forensic discipline in your paper.

The sources you use for this assignment should include at least two outside sources or articles. One of your outside sources can be any of the provided classroom readings. The source(s) of your real-life case do not count towards your two outside sources. Significant amounts of information from these outside sources should be incorporated into your paper. Wikipedia is NOT an appropriate outside source for any college level paper and should not be used as an outside source in this paper.

This paper is expected to be your explanation of this particular discipline, although you are expected to incorporate and apply the course material and material from the outside sources to your forensic discipline. To show your critical thinking and that you incorporated your outside references into your paper, the entirety of your paper must be written in your own words. You may not use quotations in your paper.

Make sure that you provide in-text citations throughout your paper, using APA format. Remember that for any information you receive from outside sources, whether you quote it, paraphrase it or summarize it, you must provide citations telling the reader where that outside information came from.

Your paper should contain the following items:

• Cover/Title Page
• Introduction
• Body of Paper
• Discipline Specifics to include:
• History
• Education and/or certification requirements
• Types of evidence examined
• Types of instrumentation utilized for evidence examination
• Inclusion of a real-life case that utilized this discipline
• Discuss if the discipline assisted in providing investigative leads in solving the case
• Analysis must incorporate information received from 2 outside sources
• Conclusion
• References Page

Format Requirements

• Paper must be double spaced, 11 or 12 pt. font and 1” margins all around.
• The body of the paper (not including the cover page or the references page) must be between 900 and 1,500 words.
• All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in text citations, reference page). Refer to APA/UMGC – learning resources found in the content page of this course.
• You must have resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information. These must be cited both in text as well as at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, sourced material must be paraphrased.
• Paper must be saved as Last Name-Week 8 Paper (i.e. Blankenship-Week 8 Paper).

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Forensic Computer/Digital Examiner Case Study Project Assignment

Forensic Computer/Digital Examiner Case Study Project Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!