Forensic Science and Trace Evidence
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Forensic Science and Trace Evidence
Forensic science is the application of scientific techniques and principles to solve crimes, and it plays a vital role in the criminal justice system. Trace evidence is one of the key areas of forensic science, and it refers to small and often microscopic pieces of physical evidence that are found at a crime scene and can be used to link a suspect to a crime.
Trace evidence can include anything from fibers and hair to soil and glass fragments. This type of evidence is often left behind unintentionally by perpetrators of a crime and can be used to establish a link between the suspect and the scene of the crime.
The analysis of trace evidence involves a number of scientific techniques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and DNA analysis. These techniques allow forensic scientists to identify the composition of trace evidence and to determine its origin.
For example, the analysis of hair and fiber evidence can reveal important information about the clothing or other materials worn by a suspect, which can provide clues to the person’s identity or whereabouts at the time of the crime. Similarly, soil and pollen analysis can be used to establish the location of a crime or to link a suspect to a particular geographic region.
Glass fragments can be analyzed using techniques such as refractive index and density measurements to determine if they match those found at the crime scene. DNA analysis can also be used to identify trace evidence, such as blood or other bodily fluids, which can be crucial in linking a suspect to a crime.
One of the key challenges in the analysis of trace evidence is the need to handle and preserve the evidence carefully to prevent contamination or degradation. Forensic scientists must be extremely careful when collecting and analyzing trace evidence to ensure that it remains intact and uncontaminated.
The use of trace evidence in forensic science has led to the solving of many high-profile criminal cases. For example, in the case of the murder of 12-year-old Brooke Bennett in Vermont in 2008, trace evidence played a critical role in identifying the perpetrator. The killer had attempted to clean up the crime scene, but forensic scientists were able to identify trace amounts of the victim’s blood and hair in a drainpipe, which ultimately led to the arrest and conviction of the suspect.
Another notable case involving trace evidence was the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. Forensic scientists were able to use microscopic analysis of debris from the scene to identify the type of explosives used in the bombing, which helped to narrow down the list of suspects and eventually led to the arrest and conviction of Timothy McVeigh.
In conclusion, trace evidence is a critical component of forensic science, and it plays an important role in solving crimes and bringing criminals to justice. The analysis of trace evidence requires a range of scientific techniques, and forensic scientists must be extremely careful to handle and preserve the evidence properly. The use of trace evidence in criminal investigations has led to many important breakthroughs in solving crimes, and it will undoubtedly continue to be an important area of forensic science in the future.
Forensic Science and Trace Evidence
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or