Four Global Social Work Values Reflection
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Four Global Social Work Values Reflection
PURPOSE
The purpose of this reflection assignment is to look at the four global social work values and values dimensions through a different lens.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using the information from your reading this week and the TED Talks you watched, think about how you can look at the four global social work values and values dimensions through a different lens. Reflect on how you think these four values fit with the social work values as you understand them and address how they apply to one of the TED Talks you were assigned to watch.
Then, write a substantive reflection in approximately 500 words. In your reflection address the questions and criteria in this assignment. Reference your sources appropriately according to APA guidelines. You may use 1st person in this assignment.Include in your reflection:
What are the four global social work values presented by Verschelden (p. 559)?
How do you see them fitting or not fitting with social work values as you currently understand them?
Discuss how each of these values is relevant to one of the Ted talks you reviewed for the week.
Now discuss the same Ted talk in terms of the social work value dimensions presented by Dubrin (p. 560 – 561) explaining which dimension of each you think the presenter is coming from
Four Global Social Work Values Reflection
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Four Global Social Work Values Reflection
Four Global Social Work Values Reflection