Four Ps Of Marketing Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Four Ps Of Marketing Assignment
Running Head: APPLE’S PRICING STRATEGIES 1
APPLE’S PRICING STRATEGIES 2
Week 2: Apple’s pricing Strategies and Revenue Models
Edina Purser
University of Mary
BUS 610 Marketing
Ronald Semarge
22/10/2020
Apple Inc’s., Pricing Strategies and Revenue Models
Apple is among the planet’s most diversified firms and, as such, has a unique pricing strategy. Pricing refers to the element of a marketing mix with the product’s price ranges. Apple’s pricing strategies mainly outlines how it links its prices and operational activities to the various market forces and the prevailing environment within the IT sector (Zhau, & Gupta, 2019). Therefore, its pricing strategy and revenue structure include multinational operations within the IT market, internet services, and the consumer electronics market, among others, including digital content distribution. This implies a highly diversified business whose pricing tactics focus on stiff competition, mainly from Samsung, Sony, Lenovo, Amazon.com, and Google (Zhau, & Gupta, 2019).
Operating in one of the most competitive markets, Apple has created a positive public image that has promoted good demand for its products over the years. As such, Apple’s brand image influences its pricing strategy. Mainly marketing its products as premium goods, Apple ensures product exclusivity and thus can manage premium pricing and other pricing strategies as deemed necessary depending on completion and other market forces. Below are the various pricing strategies applied by Apple Inc.
Premium pricing– Apple mainly utilizes a premium pricing strategy. This strategy primarily focused on providing products at a premium, an amount applied in addition to the original price. Apple’s use of this strategy makes its product prices higher than its competitors. For instance, despite having almost similar features and designs, Apple’s products retail higher than Samsung and Sonny (Zhau, & Gupta, 2019). Apple’s pricing strategy, therefore, allows it to maximize its profit margins thus can compete effectively. Despite Apple’s pricing strategy being regarded as a weakness, the combination of premium pricing and product exclusivity allows for competitiveness that makes Apple business more viable than its competitors (Zhau, & Gupta, 2019).
Skimming pricing strategy– Apple applies this strategy when launching new products. The skimming pricing strategy is most favorable when introducing new products believed to have superior features. Thus they are above the market competition. This strategy works by allowing a firm to charge higher prices on new products but gradually reduce it when new products are introduced into the market or until there’s enough competition (De Toni et al., 2017). Given Apple’s superior brand image, it can effectively apply this strategy while introducing new products. For instance, when Apple launched the iPhone 8 series, they originally retailed as high as $150.55-120.00. When Samsung introduced the Galaxy series, its prices declined to as low as $67.99 in Amazon and Target (Zhau, & Gupta, 2019).
Minimum Advertising Pricing (MAP)- This is a pricing strategy that prohibits third-party retailers, suppliers, and other re-sellers from marketing, promoting, and advertising Apple’s products below its originally stated standard minimum cost (De Toni et al., 2017). As such, this pricing strategy protects the producers from price competition, especially by third party retailers. This strategy further promotes Apple’s premium-pricing system as it allows various retailers, for instance, AT&T or Wal-Mart, a minimal marginal wholesaler’s discount. This discount enables just as adequate as possible savings by retailers to ensure that they don’t offer consumers higher discounts than set initially by Apple; thus, all third party retailers retail at the same price initially set by Apple price (Wu, 2017). Facing stiff competition, some retailers may opt to retail Apple’s brands at higher discounts; Apple manages this situation by offering higher incentives and discounts that ensure adequate savings, thus compelling the retailers to sell at its fixed prices (De Toni et al., 2017).
Captive pricing– This pricing strategy is mainly applied by firms who produce complementary goods; products or services whose usage require other product/services. This strategy involves lowering the main product prices but highly pricing the captive products (De Toni et al., 2017). As such, the clients will be drawn to the product’s minimal price but forget the additional products’ high costs. Apple uses this strategy as all of its products require specific software and gadgets that can only be acquired on Apple Stores and Apple App Store or the iCloud (Wu, 2017).
In conclusion, Apple operates in one of the most diversified and competitive markets. Therefore, its pricing strategy must include specific designs meant to alleviate competition, emphasizing premium branding while encouraging a positive brand image for better sales. Therefore, Apple pricing strategies must give much power to a stronger brand image provided that its marketing mix is mainly linked to premium pricing.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!