Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1st part:
What choices may negotiators make proactively to manage perceptions of rationality and fairness from an organizational standpoint?
Additional Instructions
The core topic “Distributive and Integrative Bargaining” must be introduced by the students (types of perceptions on rationality and fairness in bargaining).
Students must incorporate at least two (2) journal articles as well as research from the readings. Do not rely on articles found on the internet.
250-300 words are required, with all references in APA format.
2nd part:
Pose a penetrating question that is backed up by more information, proof, or research.
Need 100-150 words in APA format with all references. Part 2 requires one reference article from the ones attached.
NOTE: FOR BOTH PARTS, USE THE ARTICLES AS REFERENCES. Both questions must be saved in separate folders. Write a few things about the authors as well.
From an Organizational Perspective, Distributive and Integrative Bargaining
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
From an Organizational Perspective, Distributive and Integrative Bargaining |
From an Organizational Perspective, Distributive and Integrative Bargaining