game Design Response7 paper
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Description / paper instructions
Respond to the question below : Make sure you have reference from the PPT and have solid argument.
Try to get the highest marks as possible.
As taken directly from Jordan’s notes: What (social) change would you like to invoke? How can interactivity give us new insight into that chosen (social) issue? What could this imagined game teach us about ourselves? ?WORDCOUNT: 300 – 350.
146 Analysis and Critique of Organizational Theory
ask and Learning Process
D The task is to identify the core principles of one of the organization theory schools, expressing these principles in your own words, capturing the key ideas in a summary/synthesis and providing a brief yet sharp critique (several key strengths, weaknesses, and limitations).
D This summary of one school is to be applied to a specific organization e.g. different levels of governments (e.g. IRS, CIA, federal/local governments); hospitals, non-profits, universities, NGOs, international originations (e.g. UN, WTO), foreign country governments (e.g. China), etc. You are free to call on web sites or other public sources for the information particular to that organization.Outcomes
The result of this independent inquiry is to sensitize you to the relation between theory and application deepening the actual organization focus. There are no right or wrong answers the requirement is for synthesis, for critical analysis, and for relevant application.[Please read the uploaded PDF instruction carefully!]
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow game Design Response7 paper
game Design Response7 paper