Global Enterprise Management vs Domestic Enterprise Management
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Global Enterprise Management vs Domestic Enterprise Management
Today’s business culture is not just global; it is increasingly globally homogenous. Connectivity has shrunk or eliminated the barriers of doing business across borders, yet this new global market has unique characteristics, issues and risks that domestic firms do not face. Yet, in order to remain competitive, even the smallest of Internet retailers needs to have a global platform to effectively compete and expand their profits.
Firms specialize in manufacturing, marketing, and distributing products that are inherently their competitive advantage, generated from their core competencies. To do this, corporations need to build an infrastructure in human resources, technology that is ideally suited to producing their goods with the highest quality at the lowest cost for marketing, and distribution in the global marketplace.
Building the Global strategy at the highest level
As a firm determines the highest quality at the lowest cost, that can mean moving or opening a manufacturing operation, or production facility in another nation where they can manage the quality of goods produced while taking advantage of lower costs of production, such as labor and materials. By streamlining production and creating products that are as standardized as possible for a firm’s various markets, companies are able to leverage the economies of scale for large production facilities. The resulting cost advantages create strong competitive advantages, market domination, and maximize profits for shareholders.
By serving a global market at lower costs, global firms place domestic firms are at a distinct disadvantage. Global firms have higher volume sales from multiple markets, and competitive advantages in multiple areas such as access to lower labor and material costs, access to technological expertise, and greater opportunities for marketing.
Through the use of research, as well as competitive intelligence, global enterprise management, when properly assessed, can be successful in maximizing their core competencies to promote profitability.
The Global Enterprise – Operational Issues
We have discussed the various areas of operational functions that impact a firm’s ability to conduct business globally, as well the methods for building strategies that address the dynamic nature of the global business environment. However, managing the global enterprise requires global managers to understand the differences between each functional area in the international environment.
Global Enterprise Management of Operational Issues
One way to understand the issues of management of a global enterprise is to differentiate between the risks of an international firm and the risks of domestic firms. The following table indicates the differences between global and domestic corporations considering the risks of establishing a manufacturing facility overseas.
Domestic Risk Considerations Additional International Considerations Labor cost, availability, and skills Cultural differences in the labor force Material cost, availability and quantity Management that is not from the home nation Utility cost and availability Foreign legal systems Transportation infrastructure Foreign accounting systems Telecommunications infrastructure Foreign tax systems Shipping costs of raw materials Foreign financial reporting requirements Shipping costs of finished goods Currency exchange risk Taxes – income and property Transfer price and tax consequences Construction permits Import/export restrictions and tariffs Environmental regulations Political stability Location – Degree of livability Remittance restrictions (the repatriation of profits back into the home country) Community response to the facility State and local government incentives Structuring management team oversight
Structuring global enterprise management teams that work seamlessly to execute strategies across borders and cultures to effectively leverage or mitigate the considerations in the above table, is a key to global success. As firms increase in both size and geographic footprint, the risks increase and both business and production operations become increasingly complex.
All functional areas are impacted by the increasing complexity, which in turn increases the risk exposure for the firm.
Strong leadership creates the cohesive management team capable of impassioning staff and teams and keeping a corporation focused on the end goals. In the global arena, that requires maintaining absolutely current information in all markets, but the process of management team unity, begins with talented senior management. Each firm is different, and the lessons are best attained through the case studies of firms that have overcome the obstacles by recognizing the changes in the economy, the markets they serve, the competition, and addressing them with innovative strategies that reinvent the company, a brand, or respond to the changes in its business.
Take some time to review this video on Avon, a global cosmetic firm that has increased its sales and profits through the global recession through strong, clear leadership
Global Enterprise Management vs Domestic Enterprise Management
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow