Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Building Understanding and Respecting Families Essay
Brand and Posting Discussion
In this unit, you are learning about branding strategies organizations use to differentiate products and services from those offered by the competition.
Using the brand concepts from the unit and information on strategies used for brand positioning, share your company’s brand (current employer or ideal employer) and position.
What recommendations would you make based on the topics and concepts in this unit?
Building Understanding and Respecting Families Essay
Building Understanding and Respecting Families
Which of these categories of families do you know the least? What strengths and challenges might these families have that would help you work with them and their children? As you strive to do anti-bias work and help children understand and respect each other’s families, what do you need to know?
To begin, choose three types of families from the list below to be the focus of your exploration. You may want to learn more about families of children with whom you work or anticipate working with, families with whom you anticipate feeling uncomfortable, and/or families with whom you have not had contact.
Single-parent families
Blended and extended families
Adoptive families
One or more family members incarcerated
Foster families
Military families
Transnational Families
Gay/Lesbian-headed families
Based on the textbook reading for this week and your additional resources, summarize your insights. List at least three key strategies that might be used to help adults and/or children understand each other’s families with more respect.
For this assignment, write an essay in which you address all of the components listed above for each of the three family types you selected.
At the conclusion of your essay, summarize your findings as detailed above, including a reflective section that responds to the following questions: What insights have you gained this week with regard to specific categories of families that foster your anti-bias work with adults and children? What misconceptions or assumptions of yours, if any, were dispelled? What resources did you find to be invaluable? What qualities and skills do you already possess that might help you to positively support and communicate with every child’s unique family? Assignment length: approximately 3 pages + First and References APA
References: Anti-Bias Education for Young Children and Ourselves Chapter 9, “Learning about Family Structures and Fairness “Arndt, J. S., & McGuire-Schwartz, M. (2008). Early childhood school success: Recognizing families as integral partners. Childhood Education, 84(5), 281. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the Education Research Complete database: http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/pqdweb?did=1507312931&sid=2&Fmt=3&clientId=70192&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Grand Canyon Selling Human Organs Discussion Essay
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Grand Canyon Selling Human Organs Discussion Essay |
Grand Canyon Selling Human Organs Discussion Essay