Ground Minesweeper Robot Application Project Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ground Minesweeper Robot Application Project Paper
12 pages – double space – Font: times new roman 12
Application Project Paper about: Ground Minesweeper robot
In this course, you will be required to develop a project paper demonstrating an understanding of the course topics by analyzing, evaluating, and developing recommendations supporting use of an unmanned system design/configuration to meet a task manually performed by humans or that is uncontrolled. For this project, you will need to perform the following:
- Identify a task currently performed by another system (e.g., manned or uncontrollable) that an unmanned system would be well suited to perform.
- Discuss the perceived need of the system (why an unmanned system would be preferable, benefits and advantages) based on a current issue with the existing manner of performing the task.
- Compare and contrast possible unmanned system platforms and designs appropriate for the task.
- Evaluate and discuss the considerations (technological, social, environmental, and political) associated with an unmanned system application solution, including contributing factors, end effects, and legal, ethical, and safety concerns.
- Formulate a specific solution or research strategy to address the perceived need, including any appropriate recommendations or conclusions.
- Utilize an appropriate research method and statistical analysis (if applicable) to obtain data and reference materials to support your work.
- Recommend future research strategies to better understand the issue and add to the collective body of knowledge associated with unmanned systems.
Minesweeper Robot.
While it is good to have a solid background to the problem, an earlier engagement of or disclosure of the the idea of using UGV’s to detect and clear a mine field would keep a reader who is scanning your document for the purpose of a scholarly peer review, with a subject matter of how to use UGV’s to clear mine fields.
Clean up the fields and saving lives of military personnel. Discussing the pros and cons.
Resources
-The American Association for the Advancement of Science (Dec 1995) Robot mine detector
Retrieved from
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/213563048/fulltext/23CBECD6771B48D2PQ/1?accountid=27203
-Najjaran, Homayoun; Goldenberg, Andrew A. (2005) Landmine detection using an autonomous terrain-scanning robot.
Retrieved from
https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/217000289?pq-origsite=summon
-Kuo-Lan Su, Hsu-Shan Su, Sheng-Wen Shiao, Jr-Hung Guo (Dec 2011) Motion planning for a landmine-detection robot.
Retrieved from
Ground Minesweeper Robot Application Project Paper
https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/article/10.1007%2Fs10015-011-0879-y
-Debenest P, Fukushima EF, Hirose S (2002) Gryphon-I-buggy robot for field applications on uneven terrain. SICE Annual Conference, Osaka, Japan, pp 397–402.
Retrieved from
https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/abstract/document/1195204
-Alaa Khamis (Feb 2015) Minesweepers uses robotics’ awesomeness to raise awareness about landmines & explosive remnants of war
Retrieved from
https://robohub.org/minesweepers-uses-robotics-awesomeness-to-raise-awareness-about-landmines-explosive-remnants-of-war/
-Meghan Hennessey (Jan 22, 2014) Robot used for lifesaving humanitarian research in minesweeping.
Retrieved from
https://www.clearpathrobotics.com/blog/2014/01/minesweeping-robot/
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ground Minesweeper Robot Application Project Papers