Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description / paper instructions
This is a group project so each student will be assigned to a team (see above). The team will research the given project and collect the primary facts of the development such as the history, cost, size and dates of the development individually and then meet as a team for discussion and site visit. During the discussion phase the team shall analyze the secondary markets within the development or surrounding context. How are they performing? If it is proposed, list the promised benefits from the project such as the activities, venues, or other events that could have an economic benefit and why would they have a benefit. Use the knowledge gained in this course to date to see how they are likely financed. What is the value, if any?
Become familiar with the projects history (to the beginning of the project to current as the timeline is important) and bring your research to class to discuss with teammates. All material can be raw (un-formatted materials or photos, hand notes, and web links) but, disseminate the facts by using simple bullet points in your notes so you can communicate this information and your opinion to your team and potentially the class if selected to do so, bring multiple copies of your research to class for your teammates this is required. Material will not be collected in class but, will be viewed by the professor for credit in class. It will be used by you and your team in Task 2.
Minimum Facts to collect:
Project Size: Building (Square Feet) and Site (Acres)
Land Value(s): (Last Sale Price and Market Price)
Google Earth Aerial Map, County Parcel Map or Site Plan
Project Pictures (concept or surrounding projects)
List other projects or product types or areas affected by the developments impact, positive or negative.
Newspaper Articles on the subject which show a history of economic impact.
Your fact based analysis of the projects impact on the community, good and bad.
Multiple photo-copies for your teammates.
Project timeline
All data, supporting maps and pictures will be the same for each team member. This is the research. However, summaries may be unique as you will be asked to take a position on the project. Either for the project or against it. Each student will submit their own assignment but, duplication and group input shall be allowed.
Concepts to include / questions to answer:
Financial Facts or Obvious Impacts: Negative and positive. What is the difference in the value of the project to the economy vs the monetary success of the project for the developer?
Group Project Presentation Instant Essay 1
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Group Project |
Group Project