Group Roles Assignment Project Assignment essay
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
INTRODUCTION
There are many roles that members can take on during a group process. Some are roles that get the job done, others keep the team together, while some block the process. Its time to try and match the names and the descriptions.Roles that keep the team together
These are roles that people play when working in a group that help keep the team positive, getting along and collaborative: Encourager, Standardizer, Evaluator, Follower, and Comic Relief. Look at the descriptions below and match one of those bolded names to each in the right-hand column.
Looks at the big picture of the project and gets everyone on the same page by summarizing what the group is thinking or feeling. Add name here
Goes along with the decisions of the group, serves as an interested audience, and accepts the ideas of others. Add name here
Sees the humour in a situation, looks at problems in a lighter way and suggests compromises. Add name here
Keeps the group posted on how they are meeting goals, checks project guidelines and assess what might be blocking progress. Add name here
Listens carefully, accepts the ideas of others, supports contributions by smiling/nodding, promotes others to contribute. Add name hereRoles that get the job done
These are roles that people fulfill when collaborating that make things happen: Initiator, Clarifier, and Contributor. Match one of those bolded names to each description below.Makes suggestions, gives opinions and shares, ideas and information Add name here
Asks for additional information or ideas, requests that others make ideas more clear, raises questions and asks for definitions Add name here
Organizes the group, suggests new ways of looking at things, introduces new ideas, questions and discussions Add name hereRoles that block the group process
These are roles that people play in a group setting that interfere with the success of the group: Competitor, Blocker, Sympathizer, Clown, and Withdrawer. Look at the descriptions below and match one of those bolded names to each in the right-hand column.Makes fun of others, disrespects the work of the group and tells jokes/stories that get the group off topic. Add name here
Does not listen to or respect the views of others, puts down the suggestions of others. Add name here
Thinks their ideas are best, bullies, puts down, or patronizes or others, claims ownership of the work. Add name here
Does not contribute to group work, daydreams, does other work or sits alone, makes disrespectful comments. Add name here
Puts themselves down by looking for consolation, draws attention away from the task and onto themselves. Add name here
?
PART 2
________________________________________INTRODUCTION
Now that you have learned about different things people do when working in a group, its time to think about your own tendencies when you are collaborating and set some goals for yourself. Think about your own ability to collaborate and answer the following three questions.1 Which group role do you often play?
Respond here.
2 Describe a time when you experienced a group role that blocks progress first hand?Respond here.
3 Which role do you want to try and play more often? Why?Respond here.
PART 3
________________________________________INTRODUCTION
As you listen to the groups presenting in class, fill out the chart below. For each job note whether it gets the job done, keeps the team together or blocks the groups progress. Also note a creative comparison. This can be the comparison shared in class or one you think of on your own.Group Role Description Type of Role Creative Comparison
Initiator This person organizes the group, introduces new ideas and questions, begins discussion, suggests new ways of looking at things. Gets the job done! Sparkplug
Blocker This person does not listen to or respect others views and puts down others suggestions.
Withdrawer This person does not contribute to group work, daydreams, does other work or sits alone, makes disrespectful comments.
Standardizer Looks at the big picture of the project and gets everyone on the same page by summarizing what the group is thinking or feeling.
Comic Relief This person sees the humour in a situation, looks at problems in a lighter way and suggests compromises.
Competitor This person thinks their ideas are the best, puts down, patronizes or bullies others and claims ownership over much of the work.
Follower This person goes along with the decisions of the group, serves as an interested audience, and accepts the ideas of others.
Contributor This person eagerly makes suggestions, gives opinions and shares ideas and information with the group.
Clown This person makes fun of others, disrespects the work of the group and tells jokes/stories that get the group off topic.
Encourager This person listens carefully, accepts others ideas, promotes others to contribute, and supports contributions by smiling/nodding.
Sympathizer This person puts themselves down by looking for consolation, draws attention away from the task and onto themselves.
Evaluator Keeps the group posted on how they are meeting goals, checks project guidelines and assess what might be blocking progress.
Clarifier This person asks for more information or ideas, requests others to make ideas more clear, raises questions, asks for definitions.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Group Roles Assignment Project Assignment essay
Group Roles Assignment Project Assignment essay