Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Health Care Disparities and Disparities in Health Discussion
Our society values equality as a right for all of our citizens. Yet, the reality is that disparities exist, especially in health care. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2020) defines health disparity as “a particular type of health difference that is closely linked with social, economic, and/or environmental disadvantages.” Health disparities adversely affect specific groups or populations who systematically experience obstacles to health care based on several factors or variables.
Members of disadvantaged populations are known to have poorer health outcomes as compared to more advantaged populations.
Lack of health insurance, poor neighborhoods without quality health care institutions, lack of access to health care services, and inadequate health literacy contribute to the disparity. Social workers can play an instrumental role in closing these gaps through advocacy, education, policy making, and program development aimed at disadvantaged groups.
Disparities in health care access for underserved populations in the United States is well-documented. Most often attempts to explain disparities in access to health care faced by these vulnerable populations focus on individual-level factors such as socio-demographics. In addition, the health care delivery system in the United States is disease-centered. An individual who is ill seeks out the advice and expertise of a physician.
In turn, the physician diagnoses the condition and offers a standard treatment to cure it. Over time there has been a desire to make medicine more patient-centered, with the focus of treatment involving attention not only on the disease but also on the person with the disease. Public health offers yet another perspective for addressing illness and promoting positive health outcomes: through education, health promotion, and disease prevention, public health takes a population-centered approach to improve health and well-being.
Medical social workers are especially well-equipped to help health care groups implement more universal approaches. Practicing medical social workers require knowledge and skills to help them recognize and address health disparities and health inequalities related to access to care and provision of health services.
1) Post your response to the following:
Integrity Policy Questions
My school I attend is Columbia Southern University. I submitted a paper that I had copied offline and accidentally submitted it. Can you answer this question below for the Integrity class that I have placed in due to my foolish mistake?
Speaking candidly, what mistake(s) were made in the submission that warranted this Academic Integrity Violation?
What have you learned that will help you avoid plagiarizing material or cheating in the future?
Outline all possible repercussions you may face if another Academic Integrity Violation is committed.
Who should you contact, in order of priority, if you have questions about the possibility of Academic Integrity Violations occurring in your submission?
What is the process for internalizing material and explaining it in your own words within an assignment?
When writing your narrative and using outside sources, what information should always be included in a citation?
When using the words of the author in your narrative, it is important to cite the information so that reader knows the words are not your own. If you do not cite the information taken from the author, what academic integrity violation are you committing?
When writing your narrative, you decide to copy material from an online source into your work. You rewrite the copied material and replace a few words to make it original without citing it. Is this action a violation of CSU’s Academic Integrity Policy? Based on your answer, why is it a violation or why is it not?
When you reuse any previously submitted original or unoriginal work, you may be subject to CSU’s Academic Integrity Policy. When can you safely reuse your own previously submitted work?
You have found a great website where students are sharing their past course work and study guides. To access the site, you pay for a membership and upload some of your work to share with other students. Is this a violation of CSU’s Academic Integrity Policy? If so, what is the violation?
Health Care Disparities and Disparities in Health Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Health Care Disparities and Disparities in Health Discussion |
Health Care Disparities and Disparities in Health Discussion