Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Health Site Contractor Misses Deadline
9 Remsen, Nancy, “Health Site Contractor Misses Deadline, Again,” Burlington Free Press, June
10, 2014, www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2014/06/06/health-site-contractor
-misses-deadline/10090537/.
10 Parker, Bruce, “Vermont Fires Creator of Its ‘Unacceptable,’ Glitchy ObamaCare Site,” Fox News, August 5, 2014, www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/05/vermont-fires-creator-its
-unacceptable-glitchy-obamacare-site/.
11 Browning, Lynnley, “Thanks for Nothing: Obamacare Website Bunglers Fired,” Newsweek, August 6, 2014, www.newsweek.com/thanks-nothing-obamacare-website-bunglers-fired
-263205.
12 Fitzpatrick, Alex, “Apple Has an iPhone Headache, but It Won’t Last Long,” Time, September 24, 2014, http://time.com/3426561/apple-iphone-6-plus-ios-8-problems/.
13 Brown, James, “6 Things to Remember When Projects Spiral Out of Control,” SAP Community
Network, September 27, 2013, http://scn.sap.com/community/it-management/blog/2013
/09/27/6-things-to-remember-when-projects-spiral-out-of-control.
14 Tuckman, Bruce, “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups,” Psychological Bulletin, Volume 63, pages 384–389, 1965.
15 “Lead Integrator Atos Successfully Completes Delivery of World’s Biggest IT Sports Contract for
Sochi 2014 Games,” Atos, February
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results