Holistic Quality Control in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Holistic Quality Control in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Description / paper instructions
Quality issues in Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) can be attributed to:
1. design requirements/specifications,
2. process parameters, or
3. material-specific behavior.
Microstructure analysis have been well established driven by application-specific products. On the other hand, optimization of design tools and standards remains a challenge in MAM. In the same manner, process parameters create uncertainties along the part creation process. Using quality control methods improves reliability/repeatability of MAM production lines. Moreover, statistical models allow early prediction of assigned to a given MAM process.
Submit your paper with the following:
State of art in MAM quality control (literature review) 1 page two column style.
Present a methodology that combines the three levels as: design, process control, and material selection. 4 pages two column style.Include citation as APA style (at least 30 references)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Holistic Quality Control in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Holistic Quality Control in Metal Additive Manufacturing