Homework on Affirmative Action of Supreme Court
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Homework on Affirmative Action of Supreme Court
Top of Form
Due December 14
Bottom of Form
In 2003 the Supreme Court issued two opinions related to affirmative action, specifically university policies that use race as a factor in admissions decisions. Both cases involved the University of Michigan. In one case, the Court rejected an undergraduate admissions process that assigned points to an admission score for anyone who as a racial minority. In another case, the Court upheld a law school admissions process that included race as one of many factors used to evaluate an application.
In a brief (350-word) essay, describe each case.
Include ALL
Explain which of these two cases represents the best balance between the competing claims of the university (to pursue diversity) and the prospective students (who want to be treated fairly in the admissions process).
Explain your choice. A complete answer should:
Identify the parties and legal issue in Gratz v. Bollinger Explain the court’s decision and reasoning in this case. Identify the parties and legal issue in Grutter v. Bollinger. Explain the court’s decision and reasoning in this case. Identify one case as best balancing the competing interests at stake. Explain why you selected one case over the other.
You should be able to find everything you need to answer these questions at oyez.org.
Affirmative Action.
https://www.pbs.org/video/crash-course-government-and-politics-32/
Grutter vs Bollinger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEzSvagZ_60
Gratz vs Bollinger
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-516
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results