How Family Relationships Affect Views and Power in Communities
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
How Family Relationships Affect Views and Power in Communities
In your last paper, you looked at how rituals can construct our viewpoints. In this paper, you will bring in Andrew Solomon’s “Son” to consider how our family relationships can affect those views and our power within our communities. Using Solomon’s and Armstrong’s texts and one other work that we have read this semester, answer the following question: How might horizontal identities force people to reconsider their rituals and belief systems?
Some Questions to Consider:
Below are some further questions that may be useful to consider in generating your argument. Remember that you only need to address the above prompt in bold:
Why do parents have difficulty accepting their children’s horizontal identities?
How does having a child with a stigmatized identity help people to become activists?
How can understanding one stigmatized or horizontal identity help people to see the struggles that come with other such identities?
How does having a horizontal identity require a person to learn rituals their parents cannot teach them?
Why might a person’s horizontal identity make them reject the rituals and beliefs they were raised with?
Questions to help with the other possible texts
Giridharadas
Why does making members of Market World think about their own family help to make them care about an issue?
How are the solutions thought leaders peddle designed to keep Market Worlders from making connections between lots of different groups?
Why is it easier for a Market Worlder to pretend they are helping by making things better for one person than to admit there is a systemic problem? How might having a child with a horizontal identity affect that?
D’Ignazio and Klein
How does the way we present data reinforce vertical identities?
How might data visceralization allow parents to see the perspectives of their children with horizontal identities?
How do stereotypes limit the way that people see those they deem to be different?
Coates
How might the American approach to politics and political rhetoric be designed to ignore horizontal identities or any kind of difference?
How might understanding horizontal identities and coming to love their children who have those identities help people recognize white supremacy and its influence on America?
How do the rituals related to white supremacy keep people from seeing the benefits of their children’s horizontal identities?
Why might having one horizontal identity not guarantee that a person will be willing to see things from the point of view of a person with a different horizontal or marginalized identity?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results