Human Sexuality Discussion Essay Project Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Human Sexuality Discussion Essay Project Paper
When you walk into a job interview, it is important that you do not assume that the interviewer has the same religious, social, or political beliefs as you do.
Why is it important that we present ourselves to others in a non-biased way in business or professional settings? Please give a past or fictitious scenario that demonstrates your knowledge on understanding the importance of this concept.
Answer every part of the question. Paragraph format and should consist of at least 5 sentences.
It’s crucial not to assume that the interviewer shares your religious, social, or political beliefs when you enter into a job interview.
Why is it critical that we portray ourselves to others in business or professional contexts in a non-biased manner? Please provide a real-life or fictional incident that displays your comprehension of the significance of this subject.
Complete the question in its entirety. There should be at least 5 sentences in a paragraph structure.
Human Sexuality Discussion Essay Project Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Human Sexuality Discussion Essay Project Paper
Human Sexuality Discussion Essay Project Paper