Humans Destroyers of Ecosystems Journal Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Humans Destroyers of Ecosystems Journal Discussion
Humans Destroyers of Ecosystems Journal Discussion
Unit 5-Instructions
Watch the following video segment titled “Humans: Destroyers of Ecosystems”:
New Atlantis (Producer). (2002). Humans: Destroyers of ecosystems (Segment 7 of 13) [Video]. https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/logi…
Click here for a transcript of this video segment. How much time did you spend outside as a child/teenager? Describe your experiences with forestland or other natural environments. Are those areas still in their natural state?
Even if you have not spent much time outdoors, have you seen natural areas become fragmented due to land-use change (housing developments, industry, clear-cutting, etc.)? Consider the benefits and services provided by natural
lands (clean water, air, biodiversity, etc.). How does the loss of forests and other natural lands affect you personally? Give specific examples.
Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.
Unit 6-Instructions
Watch the following video: https://www.nasa.gov/mp4/259924main_DeadzoneWebShort.mp4Click here for a copy of the transcript. In your own words, summarize how a dead zone forms along populated coasts. What are the
major sources of the excess nutrients? Consider your community. What are some of the major sources of nutrient runoff that you see on a regular basis? Do you contribute to this problem? Discuss at least two ways in which you,
personally, can reduce your impact on ocean life. Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary. Submit Unit VI Journal »
Meet the Microscopic Life in Your Home TED Talk Discussion
We live in homes with over 100,000 microscopic species, each with its own set of unique traits and capabilities. While a few of these species cause disease, most do not. Can humans harness these microbial capabilities to create
beneficial applications and new technology?
Watch the video above. Answer the following questions below. Your posts in the discussion area should exhibit careful thought and logical reasoning and provide evidence for your position. Each post should be at least one well-
developed paragraph (approximately 4-6 sentences or more, unless otherwise indicated). Be sure to attach a scientific article as support of your stance using scholarly articles.
1) Beyond those mentioned in this talk, what are other compelling examples of microbial applications you know of? Which are most valuable to you, and which ones give you the most hope for the future (and why)?
2) Select one microbial application mentioned in this talk. Using the reference here: (https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/MicrobeWiki) find a specific example of what microbial species is involved in that application and
describe in more detail how they are involved in the process.
Humans Destroyers of Ecosystems Journal Discussion
Humans Destroyers of Ecosystems Journal Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow