Hung Out to Dry Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Hung Out to Dry Case Study Assignment
Attached the two Sources/ Articles, ” Stars Check In, Stars Check Out,” and “Hung Out to Dry.”
Hung Out to Dry Case Study Assignment
Please read, and answer the questions.
Hung Out to Dry Case Study Assignment
1.Compare and contrast the main arguments and supporting points in the two articles
write 3-5 sentences, discuss the similarities and differences in the sources’ main arguments and supporting points. Use specific examples to illustrate the similarities or differences.
- Compare and contrast the counterarguments provided in the two articles
Write3-5 sentences discuss the similarities and differences between the two sources’ counterarguments. Use specific examples to illustrate the similarities or differences.
Remember: If you summarize or quote material from the sources, be sure to provide APA formatted in-text citations and a corresponding reference list.
- Compare and contrast the types of evidence used to support the main arguments, supporting points, and counterarguments in the two sources you discussed in Activity 3.
Write 3-5 sentences, discuss the types of evidence used to support the main arguments, supporting points, and counterarguments in the two sources. Use specific examples to illustrate the similarities or differences.
Hung Out to Dry Case Study Assignment
Remember: If you summarize or quote material from the sources, be sure to provide APA formatted in-text citations and a corresponding reference list.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results