Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate
WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS: IMPORTANT NOTE: WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
Please keep in mind that each assignment has its own word restriction.
The goal of this project is to consider how leadership concepts might be used to build cross-cultural partnerships that empower people, foster collaboration, and develop and support the local community.
Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate
You will create a series of weekly journal entries to capture your leadership experiences, team collaboration, and learning, which will serve as the foundation for the Topic 6 benchmark assignment. For public health professionals, the ideals of community participation and creating a healthy culture are crucial. Consider what you learned about leadership and the establishment of cross-cultural partnerships that empower people, create collaboration, and improve and support the local community from the work your group accomplished this week. Discuss the following in a 250-word reflection:
Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate
Explain what it means to develop a health culture in your community, emphasizing the necessity of forming cross-cultural collaborations.
Consider the intervention your CLC group designed and suggest particular leadership, governance, and management concepts that could be used to empower community stakeholders and increase collaboration, resulting in support for your intervention.
Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Increasing the capacity for evidence-based public health debate