Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Influence of Societal Factors on Female Body Image
surveys. BMJ 337, a494 (2008). 41. Monteath, S. A. & McCabe, M. P. The influence of societal factors on female body image. J. Soc. Psychol. 137, 708–727 (1997). 42. Ralph-Nearman, C. et al. A novel mobile tool (Somatomap) to assess body image perception pilot tested with fashion models
and nonmodels: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment. Health 6, e14115 (2019). 43. Robinson, E. & Kersbergen, I. Overweight or about right? A norm comparison explanation of perceived weight status. Obes.
Sci. Pract. 3, 36–43 (2017). 44. Cornelissen, K. K., McCarty, K., Cornelissen, P. L. & Tovée, M. J. Body size estimation in women with anorexia nervosa and
healthy controls using 3D avatars. Sci. Rep. 7, 15773 (2017). 45. Heider, N., Spruyt, A. & De Houwer, J. Implicit beliefs about ideal body image predict body image dissatisfaction. Front. Psychol.
6, 1402 (2015). 46. Cooper, P. J. & Taylor, M. J. Body image disturbance in bulimia nervosa. Br. J. Psychiatry 153, 32–36 (1988). 47. Higgins, E. T. Self‑Discrepancy Theory: What Patterns of Self‑Beliefs Cause People to Suffer? (eds. Berkowitz, L. B. T.-A. in E. S.
P.) Vol. 22 93–136 (Academic Press, 1989). 48. Williamson, D. A., Gleaves, D. H., Watkins, P. C. & Schlundt, D. G. Validation of self-ideal body size discrepancy as a measure
of body dissatisfaction. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 15, 57–68 (1993). 49. Strauman, T. J., Vookles, J., Berenstein, V., Chaiken, S. & Higgins, E. T. Self-discrepancies and vulnerability to body dissatisfac-
tion and disordered eating. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61, 946–956 (1991). 50. Mölbert, S. C. et al. Assessing body image in anorexia nervosa using biometric self-avatars in virtual reality: Attitudinal com-
ponents rather than visual body size estimation are distorted. Psychol. Med. 48, 642–653 (2018). 51. Kosslyn, S. M. Mental images and the brain. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 333–347 (2005). 52. Preston, C. & Ehrsson, H. H. Illusory changes in body size modulate body satisfaction in a way that is related to non-clinical
eating disorder psychopathology. PLoS One 9, e85773 (2014). 53. Cattarin, J. A., Thompson, J. K., Thomas, C. & Williams, R. Body image, mood, and televised images of attractiveness: The role
of social comparison. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 19, 220–239 (2000). 54. Winkler, C. & Rhodes, G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. Br. J. Psychol. 96, 141–154 (2005). 55. Ambroziak, K. B., Azañón, E. & Longo, M. R. Body size adaptation alters perception of test stimuli, not internal body image.
Front. Psychol. 10, 2598 (2019). 56. Mele, S., Cazzato, V. & Urgesi, C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS One 8
(2013). 57. Garner, D. M. & Garfinkel, P. E. Socio-cultural factors in the development of anorexia nervosa. Psychol. Med. 10, 647–656 (1980). 58. Friston, K. The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127–138 (2010). 59. Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J. & Kiebel, S. J. Action and behavior: A free-energy formulation. Biol. Cybern. 102, 227–260
(2010). 60. Friston, K. et al. The anatomy of choice: active inference and agency. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 598 (2013). 61. De Coster, L. et al. Perceived match between own and observed models’ bodies: Influence of face, viewpoints, and body size.
Sci. Rep. 10, 13991 (2020). 62. Kim, J. & Forsythe, S. Adoption of virtual try-on technology for online apparel shopping. J. Interact. Mark. 22, 45–59 (2008).
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:14451 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93865-7
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
over-estimation in eating disordered women and healthy controls. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 49, 507–518 (2016). 68. Irvine, K. R. et al. The visual cues that drive the self-assessment of body size: Dissociation between fixation patterns and the key
areas of the body for accurate judgement. Body Image 29, 31–46 (2019). 69. Dotsch, R. rcicr: Reverse correlation image classification toolbox. (2016). 70. Cazzato, V., Mian, E., Serino, A., Mele, S. & Urgesi, C. Distinct contributions of extrastriate body area and temporoparietal
junction in perceiving one’s own and others’ body. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 15, 211–228 (2015). 71. Linkenauger, S. A., Kirby, L. R., Mcculloch, K. C. & Longo, M. R. People watching: The perception of the relative body propor-
tions of the self and others. Cortex 92, S372–S379 (2017). 72. Cornelissen, P. L., Johns, A. & Tovée, M. J. Body size over-estimation in women with anorexia nervosa is not qualitatively dif-
ferent from female controls. Body Image 10, 103–111 (2013). 73. Linkenauger, S. A., Ramenzoni, V. & Proffitt, D. R. Illusory shrinkage and growth: body-based rescaling affects the perception
of size. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1318–1325 (2010). 74. Ogawa, N., Narumi, T. & Hirose, M. Distortion in perceived size and body-based scaling in virtual environments. in Proceedings
of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 30411 64. 30412 04 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2017).
Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 422–429 (2010). 85. Limanowski, J. & Blankenburg, F. That’s not quite me: Limb ownership encoding in the brain. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11,
1130–1140 (2016). 86. Northoff, G. & Bermpohl, F. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 102–107 (2004). 87. Burke, S. M. et al. Sex differences in own and other body perception. Hum. Brain Mapp. 40, 474–488 (2019). 88. Piryankova, I. V et al. Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body.
PLoS One 9, e103428 (2014). 89. Piryankova, I. V et al. Can I recognize my body’s weight? The influence of shape and texture on the perception of self. ACM
Trans. Appl. Percept. 11 (2014). 90. Nimcharoen, C., Zollmann, S., Collins, J. & Regenbrecht, H. Is that me?—Embodiment and body perception with an augmented
reality mirror. in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR‑Adjunct) 158–163. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1109/ ISMAR- Adjun ct. 2018. 00057 (2018).
fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1243–1249 (2005). 93. Decety, J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav. Brain Res. 77, 45–52 (1996). 94. Naito, E. et al. Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum.
on body perception and body evaluation in immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 7, 31 (2020). 96. Thaler, A., Geuss, M. N. & Mohler, B. J. The role of visual information in body size estimation. Iperception. 9, 2041669518796853
(2018). 97. Preston, C. & Ehrsson, H. H. Illusory obesity triggers body dissatisfaction responses in the insula and anterior cingulate cortex.
Cereb. Cortex 26, 4450–4460 (2016). 98. Allen, M. S. & Walter, E. E. Personality and body image: A systematic review. Body Image 19, 79–88 (2016). 99. Allen, M. S. & Robson, D. A. Personality and body dissatisfaction: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis. Body Image
33, 77–89 (2020). 100. Glashouwer, K. A., Bennik, E. C., de Jong, P. J. & Spruyt, A. Implicit measures of actual versus ideal body image: Relations with
self-reported body dissatisfaction and dieting behaviors. Cognit. Ther. Res. 42, 622–635 (2018). 101. Irvine, K. R. et al. Distorted body image influences body schema in individuals with negative bodily attitudes. Neuropsychologia
122, 38–50 (2019). 102. Wignall, S. J., Thomas, N. A. & Nicholls, M. E. R. Fat or fiction? Effects of body size, eating pathology, and sex upon the body
schema of an undergraduate population. Body Image 23, 135–145 (2017). 103. Keizer, A. et al. Too fat to fit through the door: First evidence for disturbed body-scaled action in anorexia nervosa during
locomotion. PLoS ONE 8, 1–7 (2013). 104. Metral, M. et al. Painfully thin but locked inside a fatter body: Abnormalities in both anticipation and execution of action in
anorexia nervosa. BMC Res. Notes 7, 707 (2014). 105. Glashouwer, K. A., Meulman, C. & de Jong, P. J. Negative body image is not related to spontaneous body-scaled motoric behavior
in undergraduate women. Front. Psychol. 10, 580 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518877
https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518877
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01046-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01046-8
https://doi.org/10.1145/3041164.3041204
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00057
14
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:14451 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93865-7
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
(2020). 113. Alemany, S. et al. Anthropometric survey of the Spanish female population aimed at the apparel industry. Int. Conf. 3D Body
Scan. Technol. (2010). 114. Loper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G. & Black, M. J. SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model. ACM Trans.
Graph. 34 (2015). 115. Autodesk, I. Maya. (2019). 116. Mendelson, B. K. et al. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. 3891 (2010). 117. Benet-Martínez, V. & John, O. P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the
big five in Spanish and English. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 729–750 (1998). 118. Botella García del Cid, L., Ribas Rabert, E. & Ruiz, J. B. Evaluación Psicométrica de la Imagen Corporal: Validación de la versión
española del multidimensional body self relations questionnaire (MBSRQ). Rev. Argentina Clín. Psicol. XVIII, 253–264 (2009). 119. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. & Evershed, J. K. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experi-
ment builder. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 388–407 (2020). 120. Wichmann, F. A. & Hill, N. J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept. Psychophys. 63,
1293–1313 (2001). 121. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (2020). 122. Wagenmakers, E.-J. et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon.
Bull. Rev. 25, 35–57 (2018) 123. Bellard, A. M., Cornelissen, P. L., Mian, E. & Cazzato, V. The ageing body: Contributing attitudinal factors towards perceptual
body size estimates in younger and middle-aged women. Arch. Womens. Ment. Health 24, 93–105 (2021). 124. Rosen, J. C. & Ramirez, E. A comparison of eating disorders and body dysmorphic disorder on body image and psychological
adjustment. J. Psychosom. Res. 44, 441–449 (1998). 125. Hrabosky, J. I. et al. Multidimensional body image comparisons among patients with eating disorders, body dysmorphic disorder,
and clinical controls: A multisite study. Body Image 6, 155–163 (2009). 126. Toh, W. L., Grace, S. A., Rossell, S. L., Castle, D. J. & Phillipou, A. Body parts of clinical concern in anorexia nervosa versus
body dysmorphic disorder: A cross-diagnostic comparison. Aust. Psychiatry Bull. R. Aust. New Zeal. Coll. Psychiatr. 28, 134–139 (2020).
Acknowledgements LDC was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Juan de la Cierva-Incorporación Grant IJC2018-038347-I and the CONEX-Plus programme funded by Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 801538. ATJ was supported by Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad of Spain Ramón y Cajal Grant RYC-2014-15421. This research was partly funded by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2019-105579RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). The authors would like to thank Martin Mojica-Benavides for his help in preparing the psychometric curve analyses.
Author contributions L.D.C.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing— original draft. P.S.H.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. J.L.M.: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing. A.T.J.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.
Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598- 021- 93865-7.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.D.C.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93865-7
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93865-7
15
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:14451 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93865-7
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
© The Author(s) 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Scientific Reports is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
Use of a real-life practical context changes the relationship between implicit body representations and real body measurements
Results
Correlations between real and perceived hip width.
Psychological traits.
Diagnostic areas.
Discussion
Conclusion
Material and methods
Participants.
Stimuli and apparatus.
Psychological traits questionnaires.
Body esteem scale for adolescents and adults (BESAA).
Big 5 Inventory-10 (BFI-10).
Body satisfaction.
Procedure.
Data analysis.
Correlations between real and perceived hip width.
Psychological traits.
Diagnostic areas.
References
Acknowledgements
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Influence of Societal Factors on Female Body Image |
Influence of Societal Factors on Female Body Image