Information Security Risks and Mitigations Discussion Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Information Security Risks and Mitigations Discussion Paper
need a cost-effective/analysis on each of the mitigations on the slides that are attached.
Information Security Risks and Mitigations
Unsatisfactory data storage practices and security policies risk customer data.
Mitigation: Institute proper security policies and guidelines matching industry standards. Ensure
all data storage methods are meeting recommended strength in security based on industry best
practices.
In the occurrence of data compromise or data loss, business continuity cannot happen due
to a lack of proper business continuity plans and backups.
Mitigation: Institute proper business continuity plans based on industry best practices. Ensure
redundancies and protections are in place to mitigate the risk of data compromise or loss based on
industry standards. Ensure all infrastructure dealing with data meet security standards and are kept
as up to date as possible.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Information Security Risks and Mitigations Discussion Paper
Information Security Risks and Mitigations Discussion Paper