Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment
1/19/22, 7:05 PM Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoring Guide
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8004/200701/Scoring_Guides/u02a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1
Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 2 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Assess external and internal environments using a systems-based perspective.
20%
Does not assess external and internal environments using a systems-based perspective.
Assesses external or internal environment and/or uses a system- based perspective, but does not include all components adequately.
Assesses external and internal environments using a systems based perspective.
Assesses external and internal environments using a systems-based perspective and uses professionally validated criteria to evaluate the evidence on which the assessment is based.
Propose an environmental assessment that will facilitate innovation opportunities.
20%
Does not propose an environmental assessment that will facilitate innovation opportunities.
Proposes an incomplete environmental assessment to facilitate innovation opportunities.
Proposes an environmental assessment that will facilitate innovation opportunities.
Proposes an environmental assessment that will facilitate innovation opportunities and cites credible literature for the framework utilized.
Assess organizational vision, mission, culture/values, and strategic plan for gaps or misalignment with the external environment.
20%
Does not assess organizational vision, mission, culture/values, and strategic plan for gaps or misalignment with the external environment.
Lacks a cohesive systemic way of assessing organizational vision, mission, culture/values, and strategic plan for gaps or misalignment with the external environment.
Assesses organizational vision, mission, culture/values, and strategic plan for gaps or misalignment with the external environment.
Assesses organizational vision, mission, culture/values, and strategic plan for gaps or misalignment with the external environment, and provides a new insight for improvement or innovation.
Integrate relevant environmental changes into an organizational strategic plan.
20%
Does not integrate relevant environmental changes into an organizational strategic plan.
Lacks systemic thinking, a strategic orientation, or has flawed logic when integrating relevant environmental changes into an organizational strategic plan.
Integrates relevant environmental changes into an organizational strategic plan.
Integrates relevant environmental changes into an organizational strategic plan and cites peer- reviewed best practices literature to identify the assumptions or biases of the plan.
Integrate environmental change into the organizational strategy by proposing performance indicators for the scorecard.
20%
Does not integrate environmental change into the organizational strategy by proposing performance indicators for the scorecard.
Either does not plausibly integrate environmental changes into the organizational strategy or does not propose relevant performance indicators for the scorecard.
Integrates environmental change into the organizational strategy by proposing performance indicators for the scorecard.
Integrates environmental change into the organizational strategy by proposing performance indicators and metrics for the scorecard.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment
Innovation and Strategic Environmental Assessment