INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
Strictly remember that milestone 2 is a continuation of milestone 1 and your country of
Choice remains the same. Also, milestone 3 will be a continuation of milestone 2… and so
On…
INT 660 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Milestone Two will consist of an analysis of the stakeholders involved in the negotiation. Students must consider the stakeholders’
interests in the outcome of the negotiation and how their interests and priorities will impact the negotiation process. Students must also
consider how interests may differ depending on cultural considerations. Milestone Two will conclude with an explanation of measures
that will be taken to ensure all stakeholders will be satisfied with the outcome of the negotiation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Stakeholder Analysis
For the following, remember that the scope of critical stakeholders and interests may differ depending on cultural considerations.
Organize stakeholders based on priority.
- a) Who are the critical stakeholders involved in this negotiation?
- b) What is the significance of the role of each stakeholder?
- c) What are the priorities of each stakeholder?
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a two page Microsoft Word document with double-spacing, 12-point
Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least two sources cited in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade
Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Stakeholder
Analysis: Critical Stakeholders
Identifies the critical
stakeholders,
including special
interest groups,
government officials,
and individuals
Does not include all
critical stakeholders in
analysis
Does not identify the
critical stakeholders
20
Stakeholder
Analysis: Roles
Analyzes the role of
each key player in the
negotiation
Does not sufficiently
describe the
stakeholders’ roles in
the negotiation
Does not include an
analysis of
stakeholders’ roles
20
Stakeholder
Analysis: Priorities
Identifies the priorities
of each key player in
the negotiation
Does not sufficiently
describe the
stakeholders’
priorities in the
negotiation
Does not include an
analysis of
stakeholders’
priorities
25
Stakeholder
Analysis: Measures
Provides an
explanation of
measures that will be
taken to ensure all
stakeholders are
satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
Does not sufficiently
explain the measures
that will be taken to
ensure all stakeholders
are satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
Does not provide an
explanation of
measures that will be
taken to ensure all
stakeholders are
satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
25
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no
major errors related
to citations,
grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization
Submission has major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas
Submission has
critical errors related
to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent
understanding of
ideas
10
Earned Total 100%
INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment