Interview Planning Assignments Submit Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Interview Planning Assignments Submit Assignment
You will prepare a course paper prep document that you will need to turn in by November 4th, and your final paper is due online on the last day of class (December 4th one month later). (That is what you are turning in here!)
You will report your results in a 6 10 page paper in ASA formatting, using a provided course template. Your final paper will review your interviewees experiences and whether they illustrate, or contradict, the sociological generalizations presented in the lectures and readings. To earn an A, you will work to connect 25+ course concepts to the data you gather from your interview material. You should cite our course textbook, our course readings, and your lecture notes, but you dont need to cite any other outside material.COURSE PAPER PREP DOCUMENT: Turn in using a file upload on Canvas.
Using our courses writing prompt word document template (ASA formatting) available on Canvas, write a short three-paragraph paper identifying the 3 individuals you intend to interview and how they are related to you.
Remember, you want to span age groups (and possibly other demographic groups – gender, class, race, etc).
Confirm that they have agreed to be interviewed and what method you plan to interview them using.
Describe their basic demographic details, and identify some of the course concepts and/or questions you anticipate you will discuss in your in-depth interview.
Please proofread and write in complete sentences.Example of one paragraph that would earn full credit (remember, you need three paragraphs like this):
The first person I will interview is my mother, Mary. I confirmed that she is comfortable completing an interview with me, and we will do an hour interview on Zoom on Saturday, November 7. She is in her early 60s, is White, and grew up in a large Catholic household with over ten brothers and sisters. I anticipate that her experience will counter many of the Nuclear-Era ideals of childhood because her large, lower-income family experienced poverty and divorce. I would like to ask about her marriage and whether she thinks her marriage fit with Nuclear era family ideals and what the gender breakdown was in managing housework and work for pay. I plan to ask questions like, Who was responsible for which chores, like laundry, dishes, and cooking – you or Dad? and Walk me through a typical weekday as a mother raising me and my brother.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Interview Planning Assignments Submit Assignment
Interview Planning Assignments Submit Assignment