Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
The causes and consequences of intimate partner violence are assessed by ULOs (CLO5)
Incorporate feminist thought into your family life (CLO1)
Use what they’ve learned in their daily lives and in their own lives (CLO6)
Directions
Write a minimum of 500-word analysis of the topics raised in the article.
Use one of the family theories to help you understand the content.
In your paper, use at least three of the terms/concepts you learned this week. The concepts for the week are highlighted in bold print in the chapters of the supplemental readings in Hammond, Cheney, and Pearsey’s free online edition.
In your work, please highlight or bold the three terms as well as the theory.
Your paper’s topic must be based on one of the readings listed below.
To write on, Ferguson or de Jonge should read:
Making Invisible Intimate Partner Violence Visible: LGBTQ Intimate Partner Violence
De Jonge’s “Corporate Social Responsibility Via a Feminist Lens: Domestic Violence and the Workplace in the Twenty-First Century” is a book about corporate social responsibility through a feminist lens.v
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|