Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Joseph Heinrich’s Review of the WEIRDEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD
This is a review of Joseph Heinrich’s novel The WEIRDEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD.
Developmental psychology is the subject of the course.
The essay should be between 3000 and 3500 words long. Begin with a comprehensive overview of the book’s key thesis and topics (1000 words), and then add the following:
1. elucidate the author’s point of view and motivation for writing
2. Write down the most important evidence presented by the author to back up their claim.
3. assess the author’s use of evidence and explain how they handle counter-evidence
4. Is the argument presented in the book convincing? (If the answer is affirmative, please show proof.)
5. End with a final assessment of the book. (It’s best if the evaluation is positive)
further information:
1. Use what you’ve learned about developmental psychology to back up your claims.
2. It is OK to express a personal view; however, the opinion must be supported by evidence.
3. evaluate the book’s content and remark on its merits and flaws
4. No citations are required. It’s assumed that you’ve read the book and are basing your arguments on the course materials.
Joseph Heinrich’s Review
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Joseph Heinrich’s Review