Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Kirksey v Kirksey Case Discussion
I’m working on a business law multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
From Clarkson, Business Law (12th ed.)
Legal Value of Consideration
Kirksey v. Kirksey (https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/2227) is a case decided by the Alabama Supreme Court (8 Ala. 131) in 1845. Read through the brief opinion, and answer the questions. Submit your responses here.
Because of the lower court’s opinion in Kirksey is not available, you have to fill in some blanks. What do you assume happened in this case before it reached the Alabama Supreme Court? Who brought the suit and why?
Why did the majority rule that the promise by the brother-in-law was not enforceable?
Judge Ormond, in the dissent, concluded that the sister-in-law’s actions constituted sufficient “consideration” in this case. Why did he reach this conclusion?
Kirksey v Kirksey Case Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Kirksey v Kirksey Case Discussion |
Kirksey v Kirksey Case Discussion