LAS432_Week 4_Developed Outline
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
LAS432_Week 4_Developed Outline
Directions: The purpose of a proposal is to create a trajectory for your Course Project and develop foundational ideas to help your team move
forward. You will begin by answering a few key framing questions and will then complete your Developed Outline. Each team member must
complete his or her own part of the outline and contribute to the framing of the outline with the introduction and conclusion sections.
Your developed outline will be presented as a sentence outline. As the name suggests, the sentence outline presents complete thoughts in
complete sentences as opposed to phrases. In each section of the outline, highlight ideas that help support the Team Thesis and provide a clear
idea of the contents of each subsection. Use your research and discussions with your team to help develop your section of the outline.
Collaborate to help finalize the introduction and conclusion sections as a team.
Use a complete sentence to provide the response to each of the questions below. Use APA documentation for the final section of the outline to
document any sources referenced in your proposal. Remember to put at least two items at any given level of the outline, as shown in this
template.
Each team member will submit his or her own completed team outline with his or her contributing section highlighted.
Preliminary Questions
Team Members: List your team members here.
Thesis: Record your preliminary team thesis here.
Style and Form: What do you want the style and tone of the paper to be? What formal elements are you concerned with? How will these individual
sections go together?
Order: In what order will the subsection appear? Create an order that best supports the thesis and creates fluid transitions. Use this as a point of
reference for your Team Developed Outline.
Sample Template
- Introduction
- Topic
- Hook: Attention Grabber
- Research Questions
- Working Thesis
- Context
- Background Information on Topic/Historical Timeline
- Ethical Framework: What ethical frameworks will your team deploy to help develop analysis of the topic?
- Audience: Who is your primary audience? What is their call to action?
- Sectional Outlines (Each team member should create their own section outline. Sections should appear in sequence and must include the author’s name at the top of each section.)
- Section: Topic and Description
- Main ideas: What is the main idea of you subsection? What areas of analysis will you engage with?
- Technology: What technologies need to be described?
- Ethics: How does the team’s ethical angle relate to your subtopic?
- Which areas of analysis will you engage with: social, cultural, economic, or political?
- Evidence:
- What evidence have you gathered that supports your section and the Team Thesis?
- What evidence still needs to be gathered? What are the next steps of your research process?
- Connection to Thesis: How will your section support the Team Thesis?
- Relation to other subsections: What other sections does your section have a strong relationship to? How might this help you develop order and transition areas of your team course project?
III. Conclusion
- What are you proposing to achieve with your project?
- What will be the call to action for your audience?
- References (must be correctly formatted according to APA).
Grading Rubric
Total: 50
Content Points Introduction and Thesis: Provides concrete ideas for the introduction and a developed, collaborative thesis that unifies the ideas presented. 15 Sectional Outlines: Each section is represented through a detailed outline that includes subsections, evidence, and connections to the central thesis. 30 Style and format is unified and adheres to APA standards. Citations are complete and properly formatted. 5 Total 50 LAS432_Week 4_Developed Outline
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow LAS432_Week 4_Developed Outline