Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Leading as a Practice Scholar Essay
This is a graded discussion: 50 points possible
due Aug 23
Week 8: Leading as a Practice Scholar
video (Links to an external site.)
Watch the video to address the following.
(247) Jim Kouzes, author: “The Leadership Challenge” – YouTube
Be sure to provide specific examples for each practice of exemplary leadership.
- How will you establish personal credibility as a leader? How will you model the way for others?
- What strategies will you use to inspire a shared vision for those you lead?
- How will you challenge the current process to lead change?
- What strategies will you use to enable others to act?
- How will you recognize the contributions of others?
Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.) for complete discussion requirements.
Minimum 3 sources must be APA format 7 edition . With in text citations , no older than 5 years old
95 Discuss what leadership principles
For each of the five questions at the end of the case study: Discuss what leadership principles, theory or another source (s) support your answer. The paper should be a logical coherent integrated discussion which addresses the case questions throughout (without the need to have sub-heading for each question) Be sure to use citations both from the text and other scholarly citations to support your statements. Page length: 6 total pages (title page, 4 pages of text and a reference page). APA format should be used and citations and references are required. There should be no errors in spelling or grammar. Use at least FIVE Scholarly References. NOTE: This paper will automatically be run through SafeAssign, a Blackboard feature that checks for plagiarism. You will be able to see the results of the check
Case Study 1
In the unit’s monthly staff meeting, staff stress from the current pandemic is brought up as a growing problem. The staff complain that they are overworked, exhausted and there is not enough staff. They are also tired of orienting new staff, and temporary staff members are not effective. Two nurses mention that they have personally experienced more near misses when administering medications. The unit seems to also be experiencing a lack of teamwork and increase hostility among the staff. The nurse manger tells the staff that they recognize from the discussion that there is a lot of tension and this is a concern. As the nurse manager you leave the meeting and are in your office to consider how to response to the unit and the problems.
Questions
- You want to better understand the impact of the stress, workload, staffing, and quality care problems on your unit. How will you accomplish this?
- You plan to arrange a staff meeting to increase staff knowledge of stress and stress responses. What should the presentation include?
- How will you engage the staff in the process to improve stress management?
- What leadership style should you exhibit and why?
- What strategies might you use to decrease stress and improve patient care? Be specific.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results