Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Leeds Metropolitan Business Case Study Questions Term Paper
I’m working on a business question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Read the case given and answer the questions:
Balm Inc.is a well-known name in the chemical industry from past 50 years. It holds a
good market share and is also involved in manufacturing various chemicals which are
used in various industries like Consumer goods, Pharmaceuticals, Pesticides, Leather
and various other industries. Hence Balm Inc.is having 2 big plants, namely Sleek and
Geek, for the manufacturing of chemicals. Sleek being the parent plant and Geek being
started 15 years back.
Mohsin is a young, dynamic and committed employee in the accounts department of Geek
plant. Mohsin is working with Balm Inc. from more than 6 years. He is an MBA finance
graduate, with versatile knowledge in Finance. Moreover, his committed nature was
never a question and known for that, almost in the entire plant. However Mohsin always
looks forward for a transfer to the parent Plant Sleek as he feels he can get so much to
learn there. Mohsin is applying for the same from last 3 years. Every time he use to wait
eagerly for the transfer list which usually displayed on the first day of July every year.
Eventually his name was not there in the list all the time. First two times he didn’t took it
seriously and waited for another chance. Subsequently when his application was rejected
for the third time he was absolutely disturbed.
Finally he decided that it’s time to speak with the HR team. He took an appointment
where in during the meeting Anas Head HR, Ms. Maryam head Finance both were
present. Curious Mohsin directly started with the question “Why my name is not there in
the transfer list”? “I want to know the reason for the rejection of my application”. Even
though there is no difference in compensation and benefits he still always wanted to be
there. Undoubtedly, both Anas and Maryam were shocked by the tone and reaction of
Mohsin. Still they maintained the temper and tried to be cool. Maryam started “Mohsin,
You are one of the best performing employee in the department. You and Eid, your own
classmate, joined the organization together. Still you got many training and opportunity
for various courses than him, can you deny the fact.”
Mohsin, actually got understood that he is privileged still he maintained the furious
anger and said, “Yes it very true, but the fact is he got transferred in his second
application. Now he is in Sleek and I am still here.” Anas started, “But, Mohsin why do
you apply for the transfer every year, the compensation, benefits, timing, culture
everything is same in both the plants”. There prevailed an absolute silence. Mohsin
broke the silence, “All are same, but the finance department is big there with lot many
employees. I can perform more, I can shine more.” Maryam Says, “Ok Mohsin, now I
understood your issue. Being the head finance I am giving my Pre-concern, If Mohsin
applies for transfer next year I don’t have any issue in giving clearance to him”. HR
Head was not convinced with the happenings because the fact is Maryam was the reason
for his rejection of transfer. He recollected the conversation between him and Maryam on
the transfer application of Mohsin Maryam says, “Anas, Mohsin is very dynamic. In very
young age he is excelling well. I want to mold him in various financial aspects. If we put
him in Sleek he may not get the exposure in all aspects as the department is big.
Moreover”, Maryam continues, Junaid who is sub head of finance will get retired in 2
years. So I wish Mohsin to take over the position.” Now, Anas taught both Maryam and
Mohsin are not in a situation to understand. So he planned that next day he will talk with
both of them and make the things and intention of Maryam transparent.
Anas was shattered the next day when he received the resignation letter from Mohsin
stating that due to personal reasons he is resigning from the job.
Assignment Questions: M.M.10
Q1. Which concepts of HRM you can correlate this case with? (2.5M)
Q2. According to you who is at a fault in the present case? (2.5M)
Q3. What do you think Anas should do in such a situation? (2.5M)
Leeds Metropolitan Business Case Study Questions Term Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Leeds Metropolitan Business Case Study Questions Term Paper |