Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Life in Biological Environment Discussion Essay Paper
Write a 2 page paper (double spaced, 12 pt font, Word doc or pdf) on the idea below:
Science is a human endeavor, and scientists practice their craft within the larger context of the culture in which they live. Take a moment to think about modern biological science and culture and mull over the relationship between the two. Some questions you might discuss are: How do cultural and societal values influence the research questions that are pursued by scientists? Which areas / fields of environmental science seem to be heavily researched right now and what do they say about our priorities as a society? (There are no right or wrong answers and you need not discuss every one of these questions. They are intended as jumping-off points to get you started.)
Discussion must be over 300+ words:
Essay must be over 500+ words:
A new discussion has been started that may be interesting to you:
Discussion 2: Water and Life
Directions: In this module, we explored the idea of the pH scale and the importance of maintaining the pH of a given environment for the overall functioning of organisms that inhabit that environment. For this discussion, identify one area within your own body, nature, or another organism where maintaining pH is important for overall functioning in that organism’s environment. You may want to review the general concept of homeostasis before writing your post.
To receive full credit for this discussion, include a definition for homeostasis in your own words and explain the environment you chose as one where maintaining pH is critical for functioning. Also include any “fail safes” that may be in place to maintain the pH in this environment. You will want to pick a unique situation and one that is different from your classmates’ to receive full credit.
Submission: After you have posted your initial post, read and respond to two or more of your classmates’ posts. Be sure to make substantive and constructive comments (just posting “nice post” doesn’t count). For example, add something from your own experience, something you’ve read or seen. If the situation calls for it, feel free to state an opinion, but be sure to state any points with which you agree and/or those with which you disagree, as well as your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing.
Grading: This discussion is worth 30 points and will be graded using the Discussion Rubric. Pease use it as a guide toward successful completion of this assignment.
Use Link to help you: file:///C:/Users/joejo/Downloads/ConceptsBiology-OP.pdf
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Life in Biological Environment Discussion Essay Paper |