Life Insurance Strategy Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Life Insurance Strategy Discussion Essay
Here are the questions for the final exam, which requires you to write two essays
Choose 2: (12-Point Font, Double Spaced)
Q1. Recommend a life insurance strategy for a client who has temporary life insurance needs (e.g. Income Replacement, Mortgage Payoff, College Funding for a Child) as well as permanent life insurance needs (e.g. final medical expenses, funeral expense). Be specific, such as the family’s current mortgage balance is $352,819, a funeral cost $11,000 today, etc. (500 Words)
Q2. A client is interested in a long-term care policy, but she first needs to know about the nursing home coverage provided by Medicare and Medicaid. You may assume she has $247,000 in assets (e.g. bank account balance). (500 Words)
Q3. A young (e.g., 21-years-old) client just won a lawsuit (make up the amount). Explain a Deferred Lump Sum Annuity. Show the math (make up the time frame and fixed annuity yield) in Word’s Equation Editor, or in an eight column by two row table given you use the Time Value of Money Solver (TI83). (350 Words + math).
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results