Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Management Present Worth Factor for Single Cash Flow Excel
Assignment:
Using the formulas given in the Mathematics of Interest section in the Module 4 – Instructor handout, develop an Excel Workbook containing the following worksheets (tabs):
Worksheet with formulas to generate tables of time value of money factors. The worksheet must have the capability of generating the table for any interest rate. The design and number of years are based on your interest.
Worksheet that can be used to generate tables of present worth for single cash flow.
Worksheet that can be used to generate tables of recurrent cash flow.
Worksheet that can be used to generate tables of cash flow that escalates.
Thinking Like an Engineer Reading Questions
I’m working on a engineering writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Read “Thinking like an engineer.”
What was the decision Lund made?
Do you agree (or not) with Davis’s criticism of his understanding what Lund was asked to do?
Do you agree (or not) that a code helps protect engineers from getting fired for doing the right thing?
Do you think Davis is right about the code and had Lund followed it, it would have prevented him from thinking like a manager?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Management Present Worth Factor for Single Cash Flow Excel |
Management Present Worth Factor for Single Cash Flow Excel