Mark Zuckerberg’s Words of Wisdom
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Mark Zuckerberg’s Words of Wisdom
Case Study
Part 1
Read the article within the textbook, “Winning at Work – Perception Plays a Key Role in Getting a Job”, page 124.
Answer the following questions:
What are your overall thoughts and perceptions of the article details?
How important is perception when it comes to employment?
How would you (as a manager) approach an employee about his/her social postings?
The response should be between 400-600 words
Video: Mark Zuckerberg’s Words Of Wisdom (Best Quotes From The Facebook Founder) (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site.
Part 2
Log in to Florida Tech’s Evans Library (http://lib.fit.edu/ (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site.) and search the databases for a peer-reviewed journal article that is related to the Part 1 Discussion Question. Provide a summary of the article and discuss which concepts from the textbook it supports. Ensure you cite the article and provide the source information in APA format with the article summary
The response should be between 400-600 words
Here are the minimum requirements for the case study responses:
Identify the key and underlying issues. This is not a simple listing, but more of an in-depth analysis of how the issues apply to the concepts and theories you have learned in the course
Develop the key facts to support the issues. This is an area that will require some thought with the expectation that you will only list pertinent data
Discuss the solution to the problem and how to implement this to become more effective. This is an analysis of the problem within the Case Study. Make efforts to support your solutions with references from the textbook, readings, or other sources
Demonstrate that you understand the topic and data by linking the theories and concepts highlighted in the textbook with your case study response
Case study evaluation rubric
All sources must be cited in APA format
APA assistance: http://apastyle.org (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Submit your case study response
Both parts of the case study should be in the same paper; simply list Part 1 and Part 2
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Mark Zuckerberg’s Words of Wisdom