Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MAT 510 Statistical Engineering Frameworks Discussion
Statistical engineering frameworks
Compare and contrast the fundamental differences between process improvement framework and problem-solving framework. Provide one example of business management applying each framework to support your response.
RE: Week 4 Discussion
Process improvement framework is the framework that will help minimize problem errors, provided that a problem-solving framework has already been defined that will address complicated issues by identifying, measuring, analyzing and improving already existing structure over a given time until adequate results are achieved. Problem solving framework Is the process of analyzing the situation and developing a solution bridge to the gap in the issue. The major difference between problem solving framework and process improvement framework is problem solving looks for the problems prior to the implantation of the task and process improvement frameworks looks for ways to improve the task if the results achieved by the process does as not yield the wanted results.
After reading chapter 4, I realized that statistical engineering framework is very similar to the theories in project management. Statistical engineering framework directly correlates to the the same process theories of project management when laying out a framework for improving or implanting new processes into place with any given plan process. Project management seems to mostly on the process improvement framework more than the problem-solving framework after the problem-solving framework is implemented. Like for instance if a company were looking for ways to improve how consumers could benefit from an application that could increase self-service options for a customer. The first problems that would need to be addressed would what self-service options would be best for the consumer; how useful would this be to the consumer and how could the consumer benefit from the services. These would be all examples of problem-solving framework. Once the app is developed, any sort of negative impact to the types of options available, consumers not using the application and the ease of the application would be part of the process improvement framework to try to make applications easier for consumers.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MAT 510 Statistical Engineering Frameworks Discussion |
MAT 510 Statistical Engineering Frameworks Discussion