Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Mesa Community College Anorexia Nervosa Review
Upload a word document that has your evaluations for everyone in your group. Organize it like so:
The name of your group.
Group member #1
Name of group member
Provide a strength or weakness of this presentation
What “impact” score would you give this presentation? (1 – 5 where 5 is the best. Impact means: Presentation is inspiring, professional, creative, dynamic, memorable, or fun. Slides are captivating.)
Group member #2:
Name of group member
Provide a strength or weakness of this presentation
What “impact” score would you give this presentation?
Repeat for your remaining group members until you have reviewed everyone!
Please use bullet points and make sure you answer all three questions for everyone in your group!
THESE ARE THE PRESENTATIONS:
#1: Anorexia Nervosa Presentation (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AEtxCsT8kGYFkYgGRh0vQzscRHk2Y0YR/view?usp=sharing (Links to an external site.))
#2: https://youtu.be/bl6GVNBl4fk
youtu.be
#3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvMrSLmgsqg
4# https://youtu.be/YKxE0u6AOQ8
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Mesa Community College Anorexia Nervosa Review |
Mesa Community College Anorexia Nervosa Review