Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MGT 301 Google Inc Employee Motivation Case Study Organizational Behaviour
Please read the case “Google” from “Motivation” in Chapter 6. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (page – 187 in your textbook) (6th ed). by J. A. Colquitt, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J. A. LePine, J.
Question(s) for the assignment:
1.Are you in agreement with Bock that star performers should be paid far more than average performers? What should employees receiving a 4 and 5 get if someone earning a 3 on Google’s rating system gets a 2% raise? (1.25 points)
2.Should someone earning a 3 get a 2% raiseor should they get lessgiven the budget concerns caused by rewarding outstanding performers more? What are the advantages and disadvantages of a 2% rise for average performers? (1.25 points)
3.Think about everything Google’s People Operations group does to keep its staff motivated. Which motivation theories do they appear to be relying on, and in what ways? (1.25 points)
Part:-2
Page: -167, please look at the table and study it carefully before giving your responses based on what you’ve learned.
4. Which of the Table 6-2 outcomes appeals to you the most? Are extrinsic or intrinsic outcomes more appealing to you? Do you believe your tastes will evolve as you get older? (1.25 points)
MGT 301 Google Inc Employee Motivation Case Study Organizational Behaviour
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MGT 301 Google Inc Employee Motivation Case Study Organizational Behaviour |
MGT 301 Google Inc Employee Motivation Case Study Organizational Behaviour