MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection
Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection Assignment
MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection
MGT-350 • Mod 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection (70 Points) Ethics play a role in our study of environmental scanning and industry forecasting. o prepare for this week’s critical thinking assignment, review the required textbook reading for Module 3 and proceed to http://www.scip.org. On this website, thoroughly investigate information about a professional organization, Strategic and Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP), whose vision is: “Better decisions through competitive intelligence” (Vision & Mission, n.d. para. 1). In a 1-2 page paper discuss • The role of ethics in gathering competitive data • The role/s within an organization that bear responsibility to ensure ethical behavior when conducting external organizational analysis • Your thoughts about whether a professional organization such as SCIP has a place in the global business community Use specific examples to support your position. Those examples may be from your experience or from additional reading. Please use properly formatted citations to give credit to outside sources. Note: CSU-Global APA standards are required Strategic and Competitive Intelligence Professionals (n.d.). Vision & mission. Retrieved from http://www.scip.org/
Assignment 2
Evaluate the internal processes or strategies within an organization in which you are involved, such as your workplace, school, church, or community group, in order to identify a problem that provides an opportunity for innovation. Then, determine an innovative solution for addressing that problem. Examples of potential solutions are entering a new market, implementing a new practice or process, or even changing management structures. The ultimate goal of your solution should be to increase the diffusion of innovation within the organization and contribute to a culture that appreciates innovation as a key to competitive advantage and organizational success.
Though your final paper will not be due until the end of the course, you should identify your problem and generate potential solutions early on. Begin drafting your implementation plan in stages as you work through the course topics. As with your CLC project, you should research and select a model for evaluating both the feasibility of your idea and the implementation plan.
Describe the problem your innovation targets. What is the scope of the problem and which stakeholders, both within the organization and without, does it impact?
Describe your innovation and explain how it addresses the problem. How will it meet the needs of the organization and all stakeholders involved?
How does the innovation contribute to the organization’s competitive advantage?
Develop an implementation plan for effectively diffusing the innovation within the organization. Make sure the plan addresses potential resistance and obstacles, including people and processes.
Identify an appropriate method that could be used for measuring the impact of the innovation on the organization. Explain why you think this is a relevant measure.
Finally, assume your innovation is adopted by the organization. Make recommendations for additional improvements within in this organization (in processes, practices, structures, etc.) that could create and sustain momentum for innovation.
Include at least eight in-text citations from at least five secondary resources from your research.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection
MGT 350 Module 3 Critical Thinking Case Analysis Reflection