Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
The paper should define the issue and why it is of concern. It must also contain suggestions for addressing the problem or preventing its reoccurrence, including changes to current practice or policy. For example, a student may opt to discuss the scientific support for and against climate change, the pros and cons of fracking to obtain natural gas, historical events such as Chernobyl, or the response to hurricane Katrina, linkages between health and the built environment, or the ethics of sweatshops and child labor for economic gain. The suggested format is that of the American Journal of Public Health (see instructions to authors at https://ajph.aphapublications.org/authorinstructions). For this assignment, you may use primary (original materials), secondary (interpretations and evaluations of original materials), and tertiary (distillations of primary and secondary sources) literature sources. However, you must use a minimum of three primary literature sources as reference material (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Papers will be submitted via email.
on the first page, please abstract.
600 words additional to what i provided– thank you 🙂
thank you!
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |