Module 4 Assignment: Final Project Interview Proposal
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Module 4 Assignment: Final Project Interview Proposal
I have chosen to conduct an in-person interview with Kirsten Frazer, Director of Canton Counseling Services in Canton Georgia. I have chosen this interview method because I have had a sour taste in my mouth about counseling services and I wanted to change that. I always thought counseling was “weird” or for people who
have a lot of issues, but that’s not the case. Kristen is very knowledgeable and continues to submerge herself with more information and knowledge daily. Kristen is very big on her team and encourages her other colleagues to attend other development classes. Kristen graduated from University of Georgia and moved to
Waleska Georgia where she lives with her husband. She has a dog named Willie and loves to be outdoors. Kristen tries to make a difference in someone’s life every day and even if she can’t help them she will try her absolute hardest to find someone who can.
Interview Questions:
- Where did you attend College?
- Where is your Hometown?
- Why did you chose Higher Administration?
- What are your strengths?
- What skills do you have when it comes to counseling?
- What is your goal?
- What made you want to become a counselor?
- What would you like to see happen in the future?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Module 4 Assignment: Final Project Interview Proposal