Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Multi-part communications inquiry Tell it straight.
Do not use sources just as personal information
Part 1: Part 1
What does the Say it Straight Workbook mean by the term Passive Aggressive?
When you are passive aggressive, what happens to you?
What are the advantages of being passive?
What are some of the inconveniences of being passive?
Part 2: Part 2
What does Say It Straight Workbook imply by the term Super-Reasonable?
How do you feel if you’re super reasonable?
What are the benefits of being super reasonable?
What are some inconveniences of being super reasonable?
Part 3: Part 3
What does disrupting mean by the term “being irrelevant” in the Say It Straight Workbook?
What are some of your feelings and motivations for irrelevant or disruptive behaviour?
What are the benefits of irrelevance or perturbation?
What are the inconveniences of being irrelevant or disruptive?
500-600 Words Requirements
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results