Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Multidimensional Nursing Care For Clients With Musculoskeletal Disorders
Module 06 Assignment – Designing a Care Map
Purpose of Assignment
Assist students to develop a care plan that includes safe discharge information for a client with musculoskeletal trauma.
Course Competency
- Explain components of multidimensional nursing care for clients with musculoskeletal disorders.
Instructions
Mr. Harry Roost is a 78-year old male being discharge after a fracture of his right tibia and fibula. He has a long leg cast that he will need to wear for the next 8 weeks. The nurses have observed him using a hanger to scratch the skin under the cast. The nurses have reminded him each time that he is not to put anything down his cast. He also sits on the side of the bed for long periods with his leg in a dependent position. He also gets up to go to the bathroom without calling for help. The staff have observed him hopping to the bathroom without using his crutches. He currently rates his pain 5/10.
Develop a care map for Mr. Roost using the template directly after these instructions. Include information important for his discharge home. For this assignment, include the following: assessment and data collection (including disease process, common labwork/diagnostics, subjective, objective, and health history data), three NANDA-I approved nursing diagnosis, one SMART goal for each nursing diagnosis, and two nursing interventions with rationale for each SMART goal for a client with a musculoskeletal disorder.
Use at least two scholarly sources to support your care map. Be sure to cite your sources in-text and on a reference page using APA format.
Check out the following link for information about writing SMART goals and to see examples:
http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/212524
You can find useful reference materials for this assignment in the School of Nursing guide:
https://guides.rasmussen.edu/nursing/referenceebooks
Have questions about APA? Visit the online APA guide:
https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa
Assessment and
Data Collection
Three NANDA-I Approved Nursing Diagnosis *Risk: Nursing diagnosis____Related to_____
*Actual: Nursing diagnosis____Related to____ as evidenced by
ONE SENTENCE
One Smart Goal for EACH Nursing Diagnosis *Specific and measurable with a timeline. Find from the nursing diagnosis book (under client or expected outcomes section) and individualize to your patient-ONE SENTENCE
Two Nursing Interventions with Rationale for EACH Nursing Diagnosis *From nursing diagnosis book under interventions section. Choose 3 and individualize to patient. Cite these interventions.
Disease Process: (short description of patho of disorder- cite this): Common Labwork/Diagnostics:
Assessment Data (consider subjective, objective, and heath history):
Nursing Diagnosis: Nursing Diagnosis:
Nursing Diagnosis
SMART Goal: SMART Goal:
SMART Goal:
1. 2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
Module 06 Assignment – Designing a Care Map Rubric
Total Assessment Points – 65
Levels of Achievement Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery Assessment / Data Collection (10 Pts)
Lacks basic factors of the disease process, common labs, diagnostic tests, and subjective, objective, and health history data. Failure to submit Assessment/Data Collection will result in zero points for this criterion.
Briefly identifies the factors including the disease process, common labs, diagnostic tests, and subjective, objective, and health history data. Clearly identifies the factors including the disease process, common labs, and diagnostic tests, and subjective, objective, and health history data. Thoroughly identifies all factors including the disease process, common labs, diagnostic tests, and subjective, objective, and health history data with a deep understanding. Points – 7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10 Nursing Diagnosis (should fit the data) (10 Pts)
Nursing diagnosis are insufficient and/or do not fit the data. Failure to submit Nursing Diagnosis will result in zero points for this criterion.
Writes ONE NANDA-I approved nursing diagnosis in the correct format (including related to/as evidenced by) with a strong connection to identified data. Writes TWO NANDA-I approved nursing diagnoses in the correct format (including related to/as evidenced by) with a strong connection to identified data. Writes THREE NANDA-I approved nursing diagnoses in the correct format (including related to/as evidenced by) with a strong connection to identified data. Points – 7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10 SMART Goal (should reflect the diagnosis and follow guidelines) (15 Pts)
The goals meet few SMART goal guidelines and/or are not related to the nursing diagnoses. Failure to submit SMART goals will result in zero points for this criterion.
Writes ONE goal for ONE nursing diagnosis and the goal meets all the SMART goal guidelines and are related to the nursing diagnosis. Writes ONE goal for TWO nursing diagnoses and the goals meet all the SMART goal guidelines and are related to the nursing diagnoses. Writes ONE goal for THREE nursing diagnoses and the goals meet all the SMART goal guidelines and are related to the nursing diagnoses. Points – 11 Points – 12 Points – 13 Points – 15 Interventions and Rationale (20 Pts)
Lacks appropriate interventions and rationale to assist the client in resolving the issues leading to the problem. Failure to submit Interventions and Rationale will result in zero points for this criterion.
Writes 3 interventions with rationale to assist the client in resolving the issues leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes 5 interventions with rationale to assist the client in resolving the issues leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes more than 2 interventions with rationale to assist the client in resolving the issues leading to the problem with appropriate references. Points – 15 Points – 16 Points – 18 Points –20 APA Citation (5 Pts)
APA in-text citations and references are missing. Attempted to use APA in-text citations and references. APA in-text citations and references are used with few errors. APA in-text citations and references are used correctly. Points- 2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5 Spelling and Grammar (5 Pts)
Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material. Some spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material. Few spelling and grammar errors. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors. Points- 2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results