Multiple Baseline Design Discussion Paper
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Multiple Baseline Design Discussion Paper
In an interview, a young mother reflected on her use of Facebook, saying, You’re kind of curating your life, just these very specific moments, the best of the best that you’re putting up there with no context. Journalist Shankar Vedantam reported, All of this curation had a negative effect on Rachel, and she’s not alone. A recent study showed that spending time on Facebook increases our feelings of social comparison. Source: Why Social Media Isn’t Always Very Social
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/02/526514168/why-socia…
Imagine that you want to use a small-N design to test the impact of social media use on your own behavior.
For this assignment: design and describe a study, in which you need to change one of your social media habits (for example, stop using Facebook or Instagram for a certain period of time); this variable is your predictor or independent variable. Then, you need to think about the outcome or a dependent variable that you might be interested (e.g., mood, study habits, or some aspects of social life). Decide on a research question that interests you, and describe a smallN study (i.e., stable baseline design, multiple-baseline design, reversal design) that would test whether changing some aspect of your social media use impacts the behavior you are interested in. You do not need to conduct the study, but your response needs to contain the following points:
1. Research question
2. Your DV and IV, definition and measurement
3. The type of small-N design that you are using and why? (stable baseline design, multiple-baseline design, reversal design)Multiple Baseline Design Discussion Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Multiple Baseline Design Discussion Paper
Multiple Baseline Design Discussion Paper