Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Subject: Finance
Topic: Special Topics Paper
Paper details:
Please write a three-page, double-spaced paper. Discuss multiple ethical issues in finance. Try to find at least two ethical issues, and pick issues that present a dilemma or potentially have two sides to the argument. (For instance, blatant stealing is not a good topic because it is one-sided.) Try to present several criteria for judging the correct solution to the ethical dilemmas presented, and suggest a solution. (What is the basis for your recommendation? What basis do you use for judging ethical issues?) For example, two criteria for judging an ethical situation could be: The Bible, and illegality. Please do not suggest a solution such as “they shouldn’t do that.”
Think of practical actions that can be taken to address the problem. Saying “do nothing” is perfectly acceptable, if you feel any cure is worse than the problem. Just explain why. You do not need to focus on generating a lot of citations or quotations. If you decided to use sources, please cite any newspaper articles or other sources that you refer to, but focus on describing the situation clearly, and your own arguments and suggestions in plain, simple language. This is not a report, but an expression of your ideas, and it is not intended that you should spend time on research.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Multiple Ethical Issues in Finance |
Multiple Ethical Issues in Finance