Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
NA19 Information security Discussion Essay Assignment
Topic: PlayStation Network, April, 2017
Focus your research and answers on the following events and questions:
What was the impact of the intrusion in terms of direct costs to Sony?
What was the impact in terms of customers’ data breached and exposed?
How did Sony respond, technically, to secure the PlayStation Network?
Who was the attacker and what was the vector (this may be difficult to confirm; do your best!)?
What is PCI Compliance and was Sony in compliance? If not, are they liable?
Does Sony have an obligation to share any evidence about the attack on their proprietary
network? Or are they better served to not share? What is the advantage or disadvantage of
each position; i.e., share or not share?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of open source versus proprietary software in terms of
vulnerability to an attack?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
NA19 Information security Discussion Essay Assignment |
NA19 Information security Discussion Essay Assignment