NAMI Mental Health Support Group Discussion Essay Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
NAMI Mental Health Support Group Discussion Essay Paper
I am based out of Phoenix AZ and would like the assignment to reflect.
Refer to the Major Assignment 3 attachments for details on completing the assignment.
Prepare the written portion of this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following general education competencies:
University Foundations
GED1C3: Articulate strategies of self-leadership and self-management.
Effective Communications
GED2C1: Construct logical, cohesive, and persuasive arguments.
GED2C3: Exhibit proficiency in Standard American English for academic purposes.
Critical Thinking
GED3C1: Demonstrate clarity and logic in asking relevant questions and acquiring knowledge.
GED3C2: Apply appropriate critical inquiry strategies (e.g., inductive and deductive reasoning, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis) to issues and questions.
GED3C3: Make informed decisions based on historical, current, reliable, and valid information.
Global Awareness, Perspectives, and Ethics
GED4C4: Use knowledge of the past to develop understandings concerning the present or future.
Christian Worldview
GED5C2: Analyze the impact of the Christian worldview as it relates to human value and dignity
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow NAMI Mental Health Support Group Discussion Essay Paper
NAMI Mental Health Support Group Discussion Essay Paper