notions of good science assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
notions of good science assignment
Perform an Internet or library search for a doctoral dissertation that is no more than 15 years old in your area of research interest whose research conforms to the notions of good science as described in your readings.
- Using the vocabulary and concepts from the reading, describe your selection process and how your selection satisfied it.
- Characterize the dissertation; was it qualitative or quantitative? How do you know?
- Summarize the research with a focus on the hypothesis and the role theory played in the work.
- Describe the data collection process and analysis mechanisms employed using appropriate examples, supported with authoritative citations.
Be sure to completely address all of the prompts for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a reference slide at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements (be sure to include these as they are prominent categories in the scoring guide).
- Title slide (1 slide)
- Characterization of research (1-2 slides)
- Research summary, with a focus on hypothesis and theory (5-7 slides)
- Data collection and analysis processes (5-7 slides)
- References (1-2 slides)
Your presentation should range from 15 – 20 minutes in length.
Assignment Expectations
Length: 15 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner
Structure:
Title slide and reference slides in APA style. (at least 2 slides)
Characterization: 1-2 slides
Research Summary: at least 2 slides
Data Collection: 5-7 slides
Additionally, because a good presentation has few words on the slides include a script with the verbiage you would say when presenting; the script should be a minimum of 50 words per slide.
References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results