Nursing Evolution Assignments Discussion Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 |
Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago |
Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nursing Evolution Assignments Discussion Paper
Write a paper in APA Style that discusses each of the AACN Essentials and describe how you met each essential. Incorporate evidence from your previous Nursing Evolution assignments, as well as detailed examples from your didactic, skills lab, and clinical rotations.
For each essential include the following:
- A brief summary explanation of the essential that is cited with at least one scholarly source
- At least one example of how you met the essential during your nursing program
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
Nursing Essentials Rubric
Nursing Essentials Rubric |
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content |
40 to >35.6 pts
The student provides an accurate and concise summary paragraph for each Essential. All summary descriptions expertly identify key aspects of each essential. Every essential is supported with at least one scholarly source. |
35.6 to >30.0 pts
A summary paragraph is provided for each Essential. The summary descriptions satisfactorily identify key aspects of each essential, however 1 or 2 descriptions may be vague. One or two essentials may not be supported with at least one scholarly source. |
30 to >23.6 pts
A summary paragraph is not provided for each Essential. Several summary descriptions vaguely identify or inaccurately identify key aspects of each essential. Most essentials are not supported with at least one scholarly source. |
23.6 to >0 pts
Most or all summary descriptions are not provided. Scholarly sources are not used. |
|
40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Examples & Reflection |
40 to >35.6 pts
At least one detailed and explicit example of how the student met each essential during the nursing program is provided for all nine Essentials. The student expertly synthesizes and incorporates significant feedback, concepts, and ideas from the week’s discussion into the assignment. It is evident that the student has thoroughly reflected upon and met the nine essentials. |
35.6 to >30.0 pts
At least one example of how the student met each essential during the nursing program is provided for all nine Essentials, but some examples may be vague. The student satisfactorily incorporates some feedback, concepts, and ideas from the week’s discussion into the assignment. It is evident that the student has satisfactorily reflected upon and met the nine essentials. |
30 to >23.6 pts
The student does not provide an example of how they met each of the nine essentials during the nursing program. The student incorporates little feedback, concepts, and ideas from the week’s discussion into the assignment. It is evident that the student did not fully reflect upon or provide evidence of meeting each essential. |
23.6 to >0 pts
The student provides two or fewer examples of how they met essentials during the nursing program. No reflection is provided. |
|
40 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization |
10 to >8.9 pts
The assignment is organized in a clear, concise, and well-organized manner. |
8.9 to >7.5 pts
Most of the writing is concise and organized, but there may be one or two minor instances where it is not. |
7.5 to >5.9 pts
The writing lacks clarity, conciseness, and organization in many places. |
5.9 to >0 pts
The writing is unfocused and contains serious errors with organization. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and APA Format |
10 to >8.9 pts
The student uses APA Style accurately and consistently. The assignment meets all formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors. |
8.9 to >7.5 pts
The student uses APA Style, but there are 1–2 errors. The assignment meets most formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with a few minor errors. |
7.5 to >5.9 pts
The student does not use APA Style consistently and there are 3-4 errors. The assignment meets half of the formatting requirements (length and style). Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the assignment. |
5.9 to >0 pts
Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. No attempt to follow the required format is indicated. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. |
|
10 pts |
Total Points: 100 |
|
|
RUBRIC
|
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
|
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
|
Average Score
50-85%
|
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
|
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
|
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
|
Poor Quality
0-45%
|
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
|
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
|
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
|
|
|
|
|
|
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Nursing Evolution Assignments Discussion Paper |
Nursing Evolution Assignments Discussion Paper
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!