Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Nursing Informatics’ answer to the previous post
1. Please share and evaluate your competency self-assessment score in your initial response post.
What are your advantages?
What role do they play in your nursing career?
Discuss two or more competencies you’d like to enhance and how they’d help you in your nursing profession.
2. Share any prior or current experiences you’ve had with health information technology (HIT) in your practice.
Was it easy or difficult for you to make the switch from paper to electronic charting?
What obstacles did you face, if any?
Are your memories of your events favorable or negative?
What are your expectations of HIT to improve workflow and support your nursing practice in order to provide safe, evidence-based nursing care and improved patient outcomes if your hospital or facility has not yet transitioned to HIT and health
information systems, or if you are not currently working?
3. Discuss the steps involved in establishing an informatics culture. How do they help nurses provide safe, high-quality patient care? As a comprehensive opening post, all components must be answered. Do not group the answers; instead, respond to each question separately.
In the subject line, please write the topic.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Nursing Informatics answer to the previous post